Patent research and drafting workspace
Patendra gives patent teams one workspace to search prior art, shape claims, surface key examination issues, and assemble an editable first draft. Important findings stay linked to their source, so review starts with evidence instead of guesswork.
One matter workspace for the work that usually fragments across tabs, prompts, spreadsheets, and drafts.
USPTO Espacenet Google Patents Local corpusA persuasive draft is not a long answer from a chatbot. It is a chain of technical disclosure, retrieved evidence, claim choices, and human review that stays intact.
Explore an illustrative matter across retrieval, claim development, examination review, and first-draft assembly.
Search results stay tied to the exact claim language they may teach.
Maps to drive coupling and load-response limitations.
Strong passage for the control-loop limitation.
Potential combination reference. Attorney review required.
Refine scope against retrieved passages and keep the reason for every material edit.
A drive assembly comprising a housing, a torque transfer member, a load sensor, and a controller configured to alter a coupling state in response to a predicted load transition, wherein the torque transfer member maintains rotational continuity during the transition.
Define how the predicted load transition is calculated or support it more fully in the detailed description.
Use the review to find strategy questions before filing. It is not a legal conclusion.
The phrase “predicted load transition” appears broader than the disclosed calculation method. Add technical detail or narrow the limitation before export.
Two verified references cover separate limitations. Review motivation to combine and technical compatibility.
Draft sections inherit reviewed terminology, claim context, and source notes.
Terminology aligned with the disclosure and claims.
Prior approaches summarized with source notes.
One unsupported term remains highlighted.
Enablement prompts linked to Claim 1.
Fourteen claims with version history.
Word count and terminology checks complete.
Illustrative interface and example matter. Patent IDs and legal conclusions are intentionally omitted.
Break a claim into technical elements, search each one, and inspect whether a single reference or a combination actually covers the language.
Compare claim versions against cited passages, flag unsupported language, and keep an audit trail of material changes.
Assemble sections from the same matter record so terminology, disclosure gaps, claim choices, and source notes do not disappear.
Semiconductor processes, life-science devices, and precision machines demand exact language. Patendra keeps the technical record visible while the claims take shape.
Patendra is most useful when it makes uncertainty visible. Search failures, incomplete coverage, unsupported claim language, and unresolved review items should never be disguised as a high score.
Review the source that drove a suggestion without reconstructing the search later.
Generated reasoning is presented for review, not silently promoted into a legal conclusion.
If sources fail or retrieval is weak, the matter stays unresolved and tells you what to do next.
Use it to pressure-test strategy. A registered practitioner still makes the filing decision.
Patendra runs as desktop software, keeps matter artifacts on your machine, and lets you choose the external model and retrieval services a run may call.
Review the security modelDrafts, reports, run history, and feedback remain in your environment by default.
Bring your own model and patent data credentials. Usage is billed directly by those providers.
Practice and enterprise workflows can run on infrastructure your organization controls.
Move faster through search, claim iteration, support checks, and first-draft assembly while keeping professional judgment in control.
For attorneysGive matters a consistent evidence trail before outside counsel handoff, portfolio review, or a decision to invest further.
Explore the workflowCapture what is technically distinct, surface missing detail, and arrive at counsel with a more complete starting record.
For inventorsSolo
$59 / month
For independent inventors and solo practitioners.
Practice
$199 / month
For small practices and focused IP teams.
Firm & Enterprise
Custom
For larger teams with security and workflow requirements.
All plans use your own model provider credentials. Patendra adds no per-run token markup.
No inflated autonomy claims. No pretend certainty. Just a clearer account of what the software does and where a professional must take over.
No. Patendra accelerates research, claim development, review, and first-draft assembly. A registered practitioner should review legal conclusions, filing strategy, and every document before submission.
No software can promise that. Patendra can surface relevant prior art, map passages to claim limitations, and simulate common §102, §103, and §112 questions. Those outputs support strategy and do not predict an actual examiner outcome.
Matter artifacts are stored locally by default. Requests sent to model or patent data providers follow the credentials and services you configure. Review the security page for the exact trust boundaries and deployment options.
The desktop workflow supports macOS and Windows. You provide a supported model API key and any retrieval credentials needed for the sources you want to search.
A structured matter record, prior-art results, claim versions, review findings, source notes, and an editable first draft for practitioner review. Exact outputs depend on the workflow and services you configure.
A focused walkthrough is the fastest way to evaluate the workflow, the evidence trail, and the limits.
